On December 3, 2023 1:22:31 PM GMT+01:00, Omar Polo <o...@omarpolo.com> wrote:
>On 2023/12/03 12:05:20 +0100, Tobias Heider <tobias.hei...@stusta.de> wrote:
>> On Sun, Dec 03, 2023 at 08:07:19AM +0100, Lorenz (xha) wrote:
>> > thanks for the port ;-)
>> >
>> > On Sat, Dec 02, 2023 at 10:54:47PM +0100, Tobias Heider wrote:
>> > > On Sat, Dec 02, 2023 at 08:46:11PM +0000, Brian Callahan wrote:
>> > > > Hi ports --
>> > > >
>> > > > Attached is a new port for the Hare programming language. Support for
>> > > > OpenBSD was just announced.
>> > > >
>> > > > This is good enough to compile the Hello world example on the main
>> > > > harelang.org. The port itself is a snapshot I just made of the mainline
>> > > > code, making sure to include some additional improvements from tobhe@
>> > > > that just hit their tree.
>> > > >
>> > > > Specifically looking for arm64 and riscv64 testing. I've only been able
>> > > > to test it on amd64. I believe some tweaks will be needed for the other
>> > > > archs.
>> > > >
>> > > > There are a small number of tests that fail, and one that segfaults,
>> > > > but
>> > > > as support is brand new, I don't think that's necessarily a
>> > > > showstopper.
>> >
>> > can you tell me which test segfaults so i can fix this? all tests should
>> > and are passing for me (amd64)
>>
>> The harec tests don't seem to work at all for me.
>
>I'm new to hare, just playing with it, so sorry for chiming in, but
>tests are fully passing for me, both hare and harec ones. (There are
>three skipped tests in hare, but it's just the 'slow tests'.)
>
>I'm on amd64 without ibt.
this could be an arm64 bug then
>
>> > > >
>> > > > OK?
>> > > >
>> > > > ~Brian
>
>I'm just starting with it, but the hello word and other example code
>from the website works, and i did the first "challenge" of the advent of
>code in it. Works enough to be hooked in the tree IMHO :)
>
>so ok op@ if you want to import it.
Agree, ok from me too. we can fix the remaining warts in-tree
>
>(the XXX comment in harec/Makefile can be dropped, from what I see
>there's a typo in the upstream makefile that you're patching anyway.)
>
