* Peter Thoenen [2007-08-08]: > Tor 1.1.x has BEEN DEPRECIATED from before the time 4.1 STABLE was
Tor 1.2 only came out around the release of 4.1 and no update was marked a security update, so there was no reason to update the -stable ports. We have our policies and we do have them for a good reason. > two week per the developers. The developers announced all users > should update immediately yet still not seeing this port updated in > stable when I csup. So what? Where does the OpenBSD project guarantee you security updates or any service whatsoever within any fixed timeframe? -current was updated within a week and 4.1-stable shortly thereafter. 4.0 will have to wait a little longer. > Can you (Rui) update this port finally as it would count as a security > update or you just going to hang out and continue to be a subpar > maintainer. How about you smart ass send diffs instead of being a subpar user? And btw, we have a process for dealing with unresponsive maintainers. It's documented in the archives, but that of course, would mean a little work on your side finding out... > If you don't want to maintain your own port then let me know and I or > somebody else can do it but this is ridiculous. You Since 4.1 the tor port was updated within days of the release of a new version. Get your facts straight. > Sorry to be an ass Rui but with maintenance comes responsibility. You have a responsibilty as well, mr consumer, care to take it on? Nikolay
