* Simon Bertrang wrote: > On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 04:17:53PM -0700, Roland Philippsen wrote: > > Simon Bertrang wrote: > > > On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 11:59:27PM -0400, Mike Erdely wrote: > > >> On Sun, Sep 09, 2007 at 12:57:30PM -0700, Roland Philippsen wrote: > > >>> here's a suggestion for adding an Apache2-flavor to www/mod_fastcgi. > > >>> The patch (created with git) is best applied using 'patch -p2' from > > >>> within the mod_fastcgi directory. > > ... > > >> I made a couple tweaks and used "cvs diff" (below). > > ... > > > Another proposal using MULTI_PACKAGES instead of FLAVOR which allows to > > > install both at the same time. > > > patches/patch-fcgi_h works in both version, so i changed it to apply > > > unconditionally which make the Makefile even smaller. > > > > Thanks for the input. I didn't test your patch yet, but... > > > > The reason why I hadn't opted for MULTI_PACKAGES was that it would > > change the default behavior of the port. People who "want just the > > good old thing" would be forced to specify SUBPACKAGE=main in the > > environment when building mod_fastcgi, otherwise they're forced to > > install apache-httpd, which might not be exactly what they want. > > > > Or am I missing something here? > > > > No, i actually thought about it and probably a pseudo flavor like > ap2 could enable the additional package. If you like to you can > sprinkle the required .if's other the few places where it matters. > > I think the maintainer will also have an opinion to that and he's > on the cc list now... mbalmer enlighten us :-)
I don't use Apache 2. I just ask you guys to not change the default behaviour (for the in-tree Apache) and that a "final" diff has my ok on it. > > Regards, > Simon >
