Le Fri, 4 Jan 2008 17:45:19 -0800, Bryan Linton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> One question, since this version of Pan is a complete rewrite with a > new user-configuration directory (".pan2" instead of ".pan"). Would > it be better to make this an entirely new port instead of an update > to the previous one? > > Why not... So i'am asking ports@ : new name (for example pan2 ? ) or just update ?