Le Mon, 7 Jan 2008 19:07:00 +0000,
Stuart Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> On 2008/01/07 17:52, Marc Balmer wrote:
> > Pierre-Emmanuel Andre wrote:
> >> Le Fri, 4 Jan 2008 17:45:19 -0800,
> >> Bryan Linton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> >>
> >>> One question, since this version of Pan is a complete rewrite
> >>> with a new user-configuration directory (".pan2" instead of
> >>> ".pan"). Would it be better to make this an entirely new port
> >>> instead of an update to the previous one?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> Why not... So i'am asking ports@ : new name (for example pan2 ? )
> >> or just update ?
> >>
> >
> > just update. keepin the old version around makes not much sense in
> > this case
>
> especially because it might be unclear to users which is the newer
> version... 0.132 vs 0.14.2
>
>
Yes i agree.. version number is a little strange.
If jolan@ doesn't want to be the maintainer, I'd be interested in
taking over.
