On 2008/01/07 17:52, Marc Balmer wrote:
> Pierre-Emmanuel Andre wrote:
>> Le Fri, 4 Jan 2008 17:45:19 -0800,
>> Bryan Linton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
>>
>>> One question, since this version of Pan is a complete rewrite with a
>>> new user-configuration directory (".pan2" instead of ".pan"). Would
>>> it be better to make this an entirely new port instead of an update
>>> to the previous one?
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Why not... So i'am asking ports@ : new name (for example pan2 ? ) or
>> just update ?
>>
>
> just update. keepin the old version around makes not much sense in this
> caseespecially because it might be unclear to users which is the newer version... 0.132 vs 0.14.2
