Hello Ports, I test ipguard with this patch, on my lan more then half of year. And with this patch, effectiveness of the program was higher than in the default state to block illegal users and fix arp tables. To made this patch optional in Flavor, is very good idea. I proposed to use it immediately without flavor, because i think that was easy to made port. But with flavor shall be better :)
On Sun, Oct 05, 2008 at 07:42:50AM +0300, irix wrote: > Hello Girishvenkatachalam, > > Thanks. Yes, you should to apply the broadcast patch to the default port. >Maybe you should give a justification then.. why isn't it in default >sources ? From my understanding it does arp poisoning on the requesting >host (and maybe others ?), which is not really fair. I'm against having >it as default, but this can be made a flavor if it has no 'bad consequences' >.. and if you explain us why you want it so much. > >Landry -- Best regards, irix mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
