Frantisek, On 02-Feb-2009 frantisek holop wrote:
> cvs history for scaffolding makefiles which support > _only and only_ the latest and greatest and only and only > in -current dont seem like terribly important information > to me. it's not like we are talking about important C files > like in src or xenocera. hands up who would be distressed > if the initial import for liberty fonts got lost? > especially the fonts, these are pretty simple ports anyway. Sorry, I have to say I would not want to lose editing history on any file. For example, I run an older port of some of my stuff, and if someone just removed all the old editing history, I would be in trouble. However, I have seen CVS directories and files moved without losing the history, so I don't think it is technically impossible, but I would guess it is a question of whether it is so inconvenient that the trouble outweighs the benefit, but in this case, I would lean towards saying that the trouble *is* worth it. -- Aaron W. Hsu <arcf...@sacrideo.us> | <http://www.sacrideo.us> "Government is the great fiction, through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else." -- Frederic Bastiat +++++++++++++++ ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) ++++++++++++++
