On Sunday 22 May 2011 03:46:55 Ryan Freeman wrote: > On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 06:12:31PM -0400, Brynet wrote: > > Cool, thanks for looking at this Ryan and Antti for sending it to him, my > > patches made revision 1879-1881 so anything newer than that is cool. > > > > They rejected my change for OpenGL support though, this project dlopen's > > libGL.so.1 and libGLU.so.1. > > > > The following patch is needed for that, other things that might be worth > > fixing is the GTK+ frontend, and POLYMER. I think NEDMALLOC can be > > avoided. > > > > Good luck, > > -Bryan. > > Thanks, I've added that patch in. I also made additions to astub.c and > game.c for addsearchdir to check /usr/local/share/games/duke3d which makes > the shareware data pulled in with several of Antti's other Makefile > entries.
I personally don't like the extra "games" directory. Looks like some software gets installed under "apps/" too. I'd like to know what the consensus is, any developers got an opinion? > I'm not entirely sure if including shareware data with the port is a good > idea though, and perhaps it would be best served by a seperate > games/duke3ddata port akin to the current games/doomdata. thoughts? I disagree. The non-free original data can be installed elsewhere by the user, there cannot be a port for that anyway so why split shareware out of the main port? > attached is an updated version of my port with heavy influence from > Antti's Makefile, thanks ;) > > all original patches outside of the libGL changes Bryan sent me have been > removed as Bryan's original patches have been merged upstream. > > Come get some. -- Antti Harri
