On Sunday 22 May 2011 05:35:17 Brynet wrote: > I was talking to one of the developers in eduke32, according to him > redistributing packages for the binaries is fine.
I wouldn't be so sure about this. http://eduke32.svn.sf.net/viewvc/eduke32/polymer/eduke32/buildlic.txt Maybe PERMIT_PACKAGE_FTP. I would be very careful to even add that. That license sucks. It's too bad Ken Silverman botched 3drealm's otherwisely nice open source release with his own restrictive license. > The shareware data > apparently has some further restrictions.. you have to distribute not only > the GRP file but all the files including the DOS executables. > > Having a seperate port for installing the shareware/retail data files is a > good idea, users can either build that.. or grab the .GRP file for > themselves. > > Maybe a message explaining that after installing? Hmm. Not sure. :-) Yes there's a list of files that must be distributed, which I did in my original work. -- Antti Harri
