On Mon, 29 Aug 2011, Brad wrote:
> On 29/08/11 6:29 AM, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> > On Mon, 29 Aug 2011, Brad wrote:
> >
> > > On 29/08/11 6:10 AM, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 29 Aug 2011, Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Antoine Jacoutot<ajacou...@bsdfrog.org> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > You shouldn't hardcode '/etc' but use ${SYSCONFDIR} instead.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Antoine
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm sure I was missing something...
> > > > >
> > > > > Reroll diff:
> > > >
> > > > Can't the port just use CONFIGURE_STYLE=gnu so that
> > > > --sysconfdir=${SYSCONFDIR} is passed to configure?
> > >
> > > Not when there isn't any necessity to do so. The second diff is fine.
> >
> > Care to explain? Why patching when setting a variable is enough.
> > Please extend.
>
> Yes. dragging in the alternative build system and thus autoconf
> vs adding the one extra line to the Makefile is ridiculous. Why
> add a whole run of autoconf to set ONE variable in a Makefile?
Then why not use sysconfdir=${SYSCONFDIR} in MAKE_ENV or FLAGS instead
of patching?
--
Antoine
