On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 08:37:22PM +0200, Christian Weisgerber wrote: > Chris Bennett: > > > > What's wrong with libmad-0.15.1bp0? > > > > Is it actually a Beta version?? > > Who cares. There hasn't been a new release of libid3tag, libmad, > or madplay since 2004. They're stable, their package names are > legal. > > > man packages-specs also says: > > > > The last part may contain an extra suffix matching rc[N], > > beta[N], pre[N], or pl[N], with N an optional number. > > Yes, these are special because they affect ordering: 1.0beta < 1.0 > > If MAD ever gets a new release, we'll see about the numbering scheme. > There is no reason to touch this now.
Yeah, absolutely no reason. misc/cdrdao/ $FLAVOR=audio make ===> cdrdao-1.2.0p1-audio depends on: libmad->=0.15bp0 - default libmad-0.15.1bp3 does not match ... Landry
