On 2012/10/25 11:03, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote: > > Hi porters, > > > > what about getting this in? > > ping > > I can take over maintainership if that's a problem.
Well, the dbus problem mikeb@ ran into needs to be handled in some way, it ought to degrade gracefully if a dbus session isn't available, hanging at exit in 50% of cases isn't very nice. Also we need to do something about the proliferation of emacs versions in the ports tree. It's not *huge* but it's not like it's a small fast-building port. There are special reasons for keeping 21 and IIRC also 22, does this also apply to 23 or can 24 just go into editors/emacs to replace emacs23? (I probably asked this before and it might even have been answered but I can't find it in my local list archives at the moment ;)
