On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 02:06:04PM +0200, Matthieu Herrb wrote: > On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 12:55:26PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > On 2012/10/25 11:03, J?r?mie Courr?ges-Anglas wrote: > > > > Hi porters, > > > > > > > > what about getting this in? > > > > > > ping > > > > > > I can take over maintainership if that's a problem. > > > > Well, the dbus problem mikeb@ ran into needs to be handled in some > > way, it ought to degrade gracefully if a dbus session isn't available, > > hanging at exit in 50% of cases isn't very nice. > > If you have a user dbus daemon running, emacs is happy. > > With the new code that starts dbus in users sessions automatically, > there is no problem. Only users with heavily customized X sessions > will suffer. > > I don't consider this as a show stopper. > > OTOH, disabling dbus support in emacs 24 completely is also a > solution. Afaict it's not used for anything critical.
I'd opt for this. In my case I am SSH'ing to my OpenBSD boxes with X-forwarding and don't run a complete desktop. Less dependencies are always good. /jl -- ASCII ribbon campaign ( ) Powered by Lemote Fuloong against HTML e-mail X Loongson MIPS and OpenBSD and proprietary / \ http://www.mutt.org attachments Code Blue or Go Home!
