The plugin packages for claws-mail don't seem to be FLAVOR-dependent, but currently they're packaged twice. is there any point having separate packages for them?
$ make show=PKGNAMES claws-mail-3.9.2 claws-mail-bogofilter-3.9.2 claws-mail-spamassassin-3.9.2 claws-mail-htmlviewer-3.9.2 claws-mail-pdfviewer-3.9.2 $ FLAVOR=ldap make show=PKGNAMES claws-mail-3.9.2-ldap claws-mail-bogofilter-3.9.2-ldap claws-mail-spamassassin-3.9.2-ldap claws-mail-htmlviewer-3.9.2-ldap claws-mail-pdfviewer-3.9.2-ldap php and asterisk have examples of overwriting the FULLPKGNAME and FULLPKGPATH for the subpackages to avoid the second set of packages (and annoying "which package do you want?" messages from pkg_add). Previously this only affected spamassassin/bogofilter but now that various other ports have been rolled into claws-mail itself, more users are going to run into it.