On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 02:29:11PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > The plugin packages for claws-mail don't seem to be FLAVOR-dependent, > but currently they're packaged twice. is there any point having separate > packages for them? > > $ make show=PKGNAMES > claws-mail-3.9.2 claws-mail-bogofilter-3.9.2 claws-mail-spamassassin-3.9.2 > claws-mail-htmlviewer-3.9.2 claws-mail-pdfviewer-3.9.2 > > $ FLAVOR=ldap make show=PKGNAMES > claws-mail-3.9.2-ldap claws-mail-bogofilter-3.9.2-ldap > claws-mail-spamassassin-3.9.2-ldap claws-mail-htmlviewer-3.9.2-ldap > claws-mail-pdfviewer-3.9.2-ldap > > php and asterisk have examples of overwriting the FULLPKGNAME and > FULLPKGPATH for the subpackages to avoid the second set of packages > (and annoying "which package do you want?" messages from pkg_add). > > Previously this only affected spamassassin/bogofilter but now that > various other ports have been rolled into claws-mail itself, > more users are going to run into it.
Yes, it make totally sense to simplify this. I will try to handle this mess in the coming days unless you beat me to it. Landry
