On Tue, 17 Jun 2014 13:42:28 -0400, Brian Callahan wrote: > Hi ports -- > > And earlier version of the attached diff was passed around but I think > it's time now to get it in (thanks jasper for the prodding). > This will get gcc-4.8 built on mips64el (I'm assuming mips64 as > well...). This gcc was able to build working llvm binaries on mips64el > from their HEAD from about 3 weeks ago (did not build clang because > clang doesn't support mips3 yet).
Well, the important question is: Does it help the gcc4 users in the ports tree on mips64* or do they run into similar binutils issues? > OK? > > ~Brian > > > Index: Makefile > =================================================================== > RCS file: /cvs/ports/lang/gcc/4.8/Makefile,v > retrieving revision 1.36 > diff -u -p -r1.36 Makefile > --- Makefile 8 Jun 2014 18:55:36 -0000 1.36 > +++ Makefile 17 Jun 2014 17:36:31 -0000 > @@ -1,8 +1,5 @@ > # $OpenBSD: Makefile,v 1.36 2014/06/08 18:55:36 brad Exp $ > > -BROKEN-mips64 = ld: not enough GOT space for local GOT entries > -BROKEN-mips64el = ld: not enough GOT space for local GOT entries > - > ONLY_FOR_ARCHS = alpha amd64 i386 powerpc sparc64 mips64 mips64el > DPB_PROPERTIES = parallel > > @@ -59,6 +56,7 @@ FLAVOR ?= > > ONLY_FOR_ARCHS-ada = amd64 i386 sparc64 > ONLY_FOR_ARCHS-java = amd64 i386 powerpc sparc64 > +NOT_FOR_ARCHS-full = mips64 mips64el That doesn't really make sense. There is no subpackage named "full". The chunk below should be enough. > MULTI_PACKAGES = -main -f95 -objc -c++ -estdc -java -ada > > @@ -171,6 +169,11 @@ USE_GMAKE = yes > # you shouldn't skip bootstrap unless you know what you're doing > # use bootstrap-lean if you're pressed for space > ALL_TARGET = bootstrap > +# mips64* have issues with ld, but this method gets a working > +# compiler suite. > +.else if ${MACHINE_ARCH} == "mips64el" || ${MACHINE_ARCH} == "mips64" > +CONFIGURE_ARGS += --disable-bootstrap > +ALL_TARGET = all > .else > # skip the stage2/stage3 bullshit under normal circumstances > ALL_TARGET = bootstrap2