On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 04:28:47PM -0400, Brian Callahan wrote: > > On 06/17/14 16:16, Pascal Stumpf wrote: > >On Tue, 17 Jun 2014 13:42:28 -0400, Brian Callahan wrote: > >>Hi ports -- > >> > >>And earlier version of the attached diff was passed around but I think > >>it's time now to get it in (thanks jasper for the prodding). > >>This will get gcc-4.8 built on mips64el (I'm assuming mips64 as > >>well...). This gcc was able to build working llvm binaries on mips64el > >>from their HEAD from about 3 weeks ago (did not build clang because > >>clang doesn't support mips3 yet). > >Well, the important question is: Does it help the gcc4 users in the > >ports tree on mips64* or do they run into similar binutils issues? > > > > The big test from my perspective would be webkit. But I don't have the time > to test that on mips64el. I'm hoping someone on here does.
i'm pretty confident webkit itself will have *other* issues, such as not building because of missing #define pluming, or missing ifdefs, or broken js engine, etc.. dont aim for too high, start by a reasonable gcc4 consumer, dunno, trojita, gnome-shell, mscore, clementine, mpd... Landry
