-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Stuart Henderson <st...@openbsd.org> writes: > On 2015/03/14 07:25, Jiri B wrote: >> Couldn't this be a flavor of (your cloned) firefox-esr in the beginning? > > That will likely get in the way of people updating firefox-esr.. Perhaps I could truly automate the generation of patches in a way that would simplify this. Of course there can always be some issue that involves manual intervention, like a conflict in a firefox-esr patch with a Tor browser patch. As long as they were detected and flagged by the automation it might not be too onerous. I'm willing to go this way if landry@ agrees, since he's the maintainer. It feels to me like a flavor of firefox-esr is worth pursuing now that I'm thinking about it that way. The other method is always available as a fallback. Pax, -A - -- att...@stalphonsos.com | http://trac.haqistan.net/~attila keyid E6CC1EDB | 4D91 1B98 A210 1D71 2A0E AC29 9677 D0A6 E6CC 1EDB -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJVBGoGAAoJEJZ30KbmzB7bhY0P/i0TaE0H5T0ZiMJ3RmS66xkW 7/1DpikfSuKg3PqnFfdv49PiJmo1S6q2ImpQKh1Sbf7NCzwIYiQxmXgsr91gEkv8 yp5uZyh4FPqGv20W06uiniezgbJE9q8pvASf5re5vXUKyrA/9NM0FuuG5wTSlGGB TsWC6JhuocdvoMdydrXrLvsoYRTzi8bfpzbFwWEGx+THc8tGg5kJLMxPabcXbNA4 LYrsl4LPSHS10vUAsIpw+ZVw5oS6b/7lCy7npO5p8Xn5J6MZDFmxl0cRB1tuEAcC dX2h0vohYxszWpB2XOGQmjq3bUrVr3cxwzOsMHD45Air5W++dbCjlFmbUBPblfX3 GwROiTSWLfgNULBNLSBPb9tyhxLpm7r6R3vMoN2tVmmso9JFN8M3ZIsMe58emIAP ztZ2q1yUjt54AaAoNTVDeUXDpIRifDjxRUveNARLHhS0JexxXkna7D4cO51+7nD5 0GC6QbfQWc3JpX+P2J6nzOt485eqOTDNbAzY/hR6iV/HlACeJUbMnvflIePJHzxS dR0vPYy8f7MOoxtS9ZsF2RT5+vs3fSKGgqWaOidQ2tWP9Us9v4bztCc7bFmo0Nsj RMZ+N0TSphvO00bkT7g/wBMD5/MEarfstfrRdoZzi4ejWAXHgGdLAYYZYlUa8HQS bgnP4n066z3Lg3xT4ljv =rTqR -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
