On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 11:44:12PM +0200, Landry Breuil wrote: > On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 09:05:10AM -0700, patrick keshishian wrote: > > On 9/12/15, Daniel Jakots <vigdis+o...@chown.me> wrote: > > > On Fri, 11 Sep 2015 16:45:31 -0700, patrick keshishian > > > <pkesh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > >> Does the Makefile look better? I think it is headed toward a more > > >> correct direction. > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I tried to build it, I had an error, but Patrick quickly sent me a new > > > Makefile (attached), I could build it without problem then. I imported a > > > bunch of osm data in a pgsql database to test, I had the same output > > > that I usually have on Ubuntu so I guess it's good. > > > > > > Thanks for the port! > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Daniel > > > > Thanks for your test and report Daniel. > > > > Attached the new tar-ball. > > After actually looking into it... > > - you have a typo in the patch adding without-lua to configure.ac... but > since this wasnt a build option provided by upstream, why bother with > adding it and doing a flavor for this? i mean, lua dependency isnt > usually big, and since it provides quite some useful features > (scriptable tag transforming ?) why not enabling it by default ? > > - REVISION should be removed, no need to start at 0 > > - devel/gmake doesnt need to got to BDEP, it's usually done with USE_GMAKE=Yes
As for the autohell stuff, please use MODGNU_AUTOMAKE_DEPENDS & MODGNU_AUTOCONF_DEPENDS as everywhere else. Landry
