Hi, On 9/17/15, Landry Breuil <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 11:44:12PM +0200, Landry Breuil wrote: >> On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 09:05:10AM -0700, patrick keshishian wrote: >> > On 9/12/15, Daniel Jakots <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > On Fri, 11 Sep 2015 16:45:31 -0700, patrick keshishian >> > > <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > >> > >> Does the Makefile look better? I think it is headed toward a more >> > >> correct direction. >> > > >> > > Hi, >> > > >> > > I tried to build it, I had an error, but Patrick quickly sent me a >> > > new >> > > Makefile (attached), I could build it without problem then. I imported >> > > a >> > > bunch of osm data in a pgsql database to test, I had the same output >> > > that I usually have on Ubuntu so I guess it's good. >> > > >> > > Thanks for the port! >> > > >> > > Cheers, >> > > Daniel >> > >> > Thanks for your test and report Daniel. >> > >> > Attached the new tar-ball. >> >> After actually looking into it... >> >> - you have a typo in the patch adding without-lua to configure.ac... but >> since this wasnt a build option provided by upstream, why bother with >> adding it and doing a flavor for this? i mean, lua dependency isnt >> usually big, and since it provides quite some useful features >> (scriptable tag transforming ?) why not enabling it by default ?
You are right. Making adjustments. >> - REVISION should be removed, no need to start at 0 >> >> - devel/gmake doesnt need to got to BDEP, it's usually done with >> USE_GMAKE=Yes OK. > As for the autohell stuff, please use MODGNU_AUTOMAKE_DEPENDS & > MODGNU_AUTOCONF_DEPENDS as everywhere else. OK. and currently working on the compile error you reported on 'make test' and hope to have a new tar-ball soon. --patrick > Landry > >
