On 02/28, Edd Barrett wrote: > On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 10:31:21PM +0100, Christopher Zimmermann wrote: > > On 2017-02-27 Daniel Dickman <didick...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > devel/utop > > > > > > please no. > > > > I acknowlegde this is a very useful tool for the OCaml developer, but > > it also has heavy dependencies. > > Since most OCaml users on OpenBSD use opam, maintaining this stuff is a > > burden. > > I also would like to keep utop if possible. Can you install utop from > opam? If so you can probably nuke the port. FWIW, I have never used > opam, but then, I only dabbled in OCaml.
utop is indeed installable from opam. I always use it thusly. I classify it as a programmer's tool, not an end-usr tool and thus I would indeed like to remove the port (and the resulting dangling dependencies as pointed out by Chris). .... Ken > > > As an alternative, when utop is unavailable, I use `rlwrap ocaml` to get > > nice command line editing. > > I recall that I didn't get on with this solution for some reason. > > -- > Best Regards > Edd Barrett > > http://www.theunixzoo.co.uk >
