On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 03:55:26PM +0000, Edd Barrett wrote: > On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 04:40:27PM +0100, Sebastien Marie wrote: > > so the bootstrap archive will look like really a full package. > > How about a separate port for docs that depends on lang/rust? Would that > be more palatable? >
I assume it could be possible, but I am unsure if rustbuild will be able to generate only the documentation (and not just binary + doc). Testing is required :) I don't have time to work on that. But I should able to review a port (and modifications on lang/rust to share some variables). For now, I already shared a link to download the documentation, and as we are in -beta, I would like to see rust-1.16.0 to be commited in order to have it in 6.1. -- Sebastien Marie
