Okey, I need advice from Stuart or someone :) The problem is the following: Pandas can be built "inplace" for testing and for building the docs. If you do it "inplace" yo do not have the "install" option on setup.py to automatically get a nice and clean install, one should "get the files" from in between the source... not nice... and not something that I want to maintain that way... If you do it with the normal build-install approach you get py-pandas ready to go, but without docs. You can build the docs and run the tests once py-pandas is installed, the docs can be built quickly separately, so no problem there, I would just make py-pandas-docs and that's it. The problem is with the test, the test only works well when testing itself (that is, testing against site-packages/pandas), this is not nice ether because it leaves a horrible trail of files in the package directory and if you run uninstall will get the "directory not empty" problem. But test pass pretty good, I would need someone to really test the "live?" version of py-pandas, maybe Edd can help me with this.
If the normal build style is acceptable with building docs separately and testing itself is OK I will proceed to merge the py-pandas in wip. I could not reach shadchin@ to talk this with him and according to github that repository is the for a year now... so... I like aggressive takeovers. :) Cheers. Elias. 2018-06-06 16:17 GMT-03:00 Elias M. Mariani <marianiel...@gmail.com>: >> You should be able to fix this by setting TZ=UTC in the environment. > Great idea. > >>> Did you know that py-pandas already was in openbsd-wip? You can find it >>> at https://github.com/jasperla/openbsd-wip/tree/master/math/py-pandas > I did not realized that py-pandas was already in there, my mind > discarded that because I consider the devel category only, my bad... > >>> >>> That said, I had a quick look at your Makefile, and have some comments: >>> - I think CATEGORIES should be math >>> - DEPS should be sorted >> >> ack. > > Will do. > >>> - Having py-pandas as test dependency doesn't make sense. Please have >>> a look at shadchin@'s port as mentioned above >> >> It's not uncommon with python things, though perhaps just adding a make >> dependency like this is even more common: >> >> do-test: fake >> >>> My suggestion would be to contact shadchin@ and try to combine efforts. >>> >>> BTW pandas would make a great addition to ports. >>> >> >> +1 > > Yes, I will contact shadchin@ to merge both versions, already working on it. > In fact, he sorted the testing part much better than I did. > > Cheers. > Elias.
