On 2018/07/30 14:00, jus...@atlantide.t28.net wrote: > Hello Stuart, > > thanks for your feedback. > > [...] > > Hmm. Looking at the unpacked source there are copies of bzip2, zlib, > > minisat, CUDD in there so the license string could do with a bit more > > than just "MIT". (Of course it would be better still if it used the > > external copies ..) > > Could you please suggest a "template" string? > Or a port in similar conditions where I could take some hints from?
Normally you would list the licenses, the exact format doesn't matter, it's not machine processed. > > The build is considerably faster if switched to cmake, the dependency > > generation stage of the Makefile-based build takes ages. 20s with cmake > > vs 1m33s for a build using ccache with a primed cache. (Still needs > > USE_GMAKE and either "ln -s `which ${MAKE_PROGRAM}` ${WRKDIR}/bin/make" > > or a patch to CMakeLists.txt). > > I'll dig into this soon. > > All the best > > -- > Alessandro >