On 2/19/19 3:44 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote: > I think it needs to say somewhere that it requires graphite-web which > is not available in ports. (There's extra risk of confusion because > we do have graphics/graphite2 which is something else).
I already submitted a port for py-graphite-web about 3 months ago, along with all the other changes required to make it work. But I have received a disappointing amount of replies. But I added a note to DESCR to inform people. > > As you have it now (bearing in mind that it pulls in ../Makefile.inc) > it has me listed as maintainer, which I don't want, please either set > an explicit ports@ maintainer to override that, or take maintainer > yourself. > Set maintainer to myself. Update port attached. > > > On 2019/02/19 07:51, Martijn van Duren wrote: >> ping >> >> On 11/27/18 2:26 PM, Martijn van Duren wrote: >>> Here's a port of web2-module-graphite. I took web2-module-director as a >>> basis, which worked well enough. >>> >>> The diff is for a quirk when having a service check based on >>> snmp-storage. The check uses regexes and anchoring with a '^' is stored >>> as is by icinga2-graphite, while web2-module-graphite escapes it with a >>> '_'. Upstream is already notified but not yet merged.[0] >>> >>> This requires a running graphite including graphite-web, but since that >>> can run on a separate host I don't think we should add it as a >>> dependency. This way we can also include it right away for people >>> offloading their icinga2 graphite needs to an instance not maintained >>> by ports. >>> >>> OK? >>> >>> martijn@ >>> >>> [0]https://github.com/Icinga/icingaweb2-module-graphite/pull/189 >>> > >
web2-module-graphite.tar.gz
Description: application/gzip
