Railroad Jerk are a super-fine rock band.

b

-----Original Message-----
From: Amy Haugesag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: passenger side <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tuesday, February 09, 1999 11:11 PM
Subject: Re: Alejandro Escovedo/Buddy Miller/Railroad Jerk


>>OK, I realize I should be publicly flogged for being completely ignorant
of
>>ND's "Man o' the Decade," but I saw an AE disc sitting patiently in the
used
>>section of a local record store and wondered about it. It was called "13
>>Songs" or something like that--the one with the "Theme Song." Anyway, I
also
>>saw a Buddy Miller disc that had the word "lies" in the title. Well,
anyway,
>>you get the picture. These are a couple dudes whose names tend to get
>>dropped every day or three, so all you fans let me know what's up.
>
>_Thirteen Songs_ is a pretty swell record, though not exactly cheerful.
>It's fairly hard to describe Alejandro in a convenient sound bite, but he's
>got elements of punk (he was a member of seminal SF punk band the Nuns),
>singer/songwriter, honky tonk, and alt-country in his sound, along with
>lots of other influences. Buddy Miller is much more of a straight
>country/country-rock artist, in the Steve Earle vein, and everything he
>does is good. IMHO, of course. <g>
>
>>
>>And for the fella who asked about Railroad Jerk, I think "One Track Mind"
>>may be one of the sleeper records of the decade. If you like the JSBX--but
>>grow tired of the schtick--and you like Beck's wacky
>>electro-folk-hipster-hop-damnation, check it out. Clever without being too
>>cheeky, methinks. I thought Third Rail was a step backward, but good
enough
>>to buy used. Are they even around anymore? I haven't heard from them in
>>awhile.
>
>Railroad Jerk just played in NYC a couple of weekends ago. I missed them on
>the same night that I missed the Old 97s. I haven't heard rumors of any new
>records in the works, but what do I know? I'd like to hear what they do
>next, though; they're an underrated bunch, and Lance's comparisons to Jon
>Spencer and Beck are apt ones.
>
>--Amy
>
>

Reply via email to