On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 11:41 PM, Duane Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 19 Aug 2008, Adam C. Mathews wrote: > >> Presenting using the following blacklists... >> >> dul.dnsbl.sorbs.net >> psbl.surriel.com >> zen.spamhaus.org >> >> >> These do a good job for me, but I wanted to look for opinions on a >> couple additional ones. Specifically look for false-positive opinions, >> adding additional DNS lookups isn't much concern to me. >> >> The two I am looking at are ... >> >> hostkarma.junkemailfilter.com
Evaluated this one about a year ago. Too many false positives to use as a block list, but I do include it as a spamassassin check. Using the list as the author intends is difficult in postfix without a policy filter, because the list returns several different values with different meanings. > > I will give the list developer credit for the fact he/she has done research. > However, the list developer has not provided any evidence as to the results > or validity of using this list (even when asked for). > > Not to mention, I have not found anywhere on the site where it lists any > price for mass-querying or any data feed service for its zone files. We > purchase data feed service for SpamHaus and query an average of close to > four(4) million every 24 hours. > >> combined.rbl.msrbl.net > > Don't know much about this list. Perhaps someone else has feedback. > > -d > I would also take a good look at the 'invaluement antispam rbl', see http://dnsbl.invaluement.com/ This list performs extremely well for us. -Aaron
