On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 07:08:33 -0400 (EDT)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Wietse Venema) wrote:
> Bj?rn T Johansen:
> > On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 14:16:22 -0400 (EDT)
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Wietse Venema) wrote:
> >
> > > Bj?rn T Johansen:
> > > > On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 07:08:32 -0400 (EDT)
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Wietse Venema) wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Bj?rn T Johansen:
> > > > > > Aug 20 12:36:44 web postfix/pipe[2802]: 88AC71FA25F: to=<[EMAIL
> > > > > > PROTECTED]>, relay=dovecot, delay=0.09,
> > > > > > delays=0.07/0/0/0.02, dsn=5.4.6, status=bounced (mail forwarding
> > > > > > loop for [EMAIL PROTECTED])
> > > > >
> > > > > You are sending mail with
> > > > >
> > > > > Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > >
> > > > > into the pipe daemon.
> > > > >
> > > > > See:
> > > > > The RELEASE_NOTES file
> > > > > man 8 pipe
> > > > >
> > > > > Wietse
> > > >
> > > > Yes, in my master.cf file I have this..:
> > > >
> > > > dovecot unix - n n - - pipe
> > > > flags=DRhu user=vmail:vmail argv=/usr/libexec/dovecot/deliver -d
> > > > ${recipient}
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I can't use this anymore with version 2.5.x?
> > >
> > > Please read the documents that I referred you to.
> > >
> > > Wietse
> >
> >
> > Yes, I did but I am not sure what the solution is? I see that the D flag
> > adds a Delivered-To header and that
> > it checks the mail to see if it already has a Delivered-To header and the
> > message is returned as undeliverable if
> > so, as of version 2.5.x...
> > But is the solution to this to remove the D flag from the pipe transport?
> > Or should I increase
> > dovecot_destination_recipient_limit from 1 to 2?
>
> Given this description:
>
> D Prepend a "Delivered-To: recipient" message header with
> the envelope recipient address. Note: for this to work,
> the transport_destination_recipient_limit must be 1 (see
> SINGLE-RECIPIENT DELIVERY above for details).
>
> The D flag also enforces loop detection (Postfix 2.5 and
> later): if a message already contains a Delivered-To:
> header with the same recipient address, then the message
> is returned as undeliverable. The address comparison is
> case insensitive.
>
> This feature is available as of Postfix 2.0.
>
> Which solution would you pick when mail is returned as undeliverable
> because a "mail forwarding loop" was detected?
>
> You will have to use your own brain cycles.
>
Well, I just thought that the D flag was included for a reason and that
removing the flag maybe would break something
else...
Instead of wasting time to write such long answer maybe a simple yes or no
would be sufficient.......
Isn't that the idea with a mailinglist, getting help and verify solutions or am
I misunderstanding something??
BTJ
