postfix-users  

Messages by Thread

• [pfx] Dynamic content filter allows for forged mails to be signed with DKIM Peymaneh Nejad via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: Dynamic content filter allows for forged mails to be signed with DKIM Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: Dynamic content filter allows for forged mails to be signed with DKIM Peymaneh Nejad via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: Dynamic content filter allows for forged mails to be signed with DKIM Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: Dynamic content filter allows for forged mails to be signed with DKIM Bill Cole via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: Dynamic content filter allows for forged mails to be signed with DKIM Peymaneh Nejad via Postfix-users
• [pfx] Postfix stable release 3.11.6 and legacy releases 3.10.13, 3.9.14, 3.8.20, 3.7.22, 3.6.20, 3.5.27 Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: Postfix stable release 3.11.6 and legacy releases 3.10.13, 3.9.14, 3.8.20, 3.7.22, 3.6.20, 3.5.27 Herbert J. Skuhra via Postfix-users
• [pfx] fatal: dict_sqlite_lookup: [...] SQL prepare failed: attempt to write a readonly database? lama--- via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: fatal: dict_sqlite_lookup: [...] SQL prepare failed: attempt to write a readonly database? Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: fatal: dict_sqlite_lookup: [...] SQL prepare failed: attempt to write a readonly database? Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: fatal: dict_sqlite_lookup: [...] SQL prepare failed: attempt to write a readonly database? postfix--- via Postfix-users
• [pfx] Heads-up for Postfix distribution maintainers Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
• [pfx] content_filter on ipv6 ? lejeczek via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: content_filter on ipv6 ? Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: content_filter on ipv6 ? Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: content_filter on ipv6 ? Benny Pedersen via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: content_filter on ipv6 ? Benny Pedersen via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: content_filter on ipv6 ? Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: content_filter on ipv6 ? lejeczek via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: content_filter on ipv6 ? Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: content_filter on ipv6 ? lejeczek via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: content_filter on ipv6 ? Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: content_filter on ipv6 ? lejeczek via Postfix-users
• [pfx] New to Postfix, Google problems Joe via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: New to Postfix, Google problems Jim Seymour via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: New to Postfix, Google problems pyllyukko via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: New to Postfix, Google problems Jaroslaw Rafa via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: New to Postfix, Google problems Ralph Seichter via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: New to Postfix, Google problems Joe via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: New to Postfix, Google problems Jim Seymour via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: certificates (was: New to Postfix, Google problems) Claus Assmann via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: certificates (was: New to Postfix, Google problems) Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: New to Postfix, Google problems Jaroslaw Rafa via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: New to Postfix, Google problems Paul Tomblin via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: New to Postfix, Google problems Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: New to Postfix, Google problems Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: New to Postfix, Google problems Joe via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: New to Postfix, Google problems Jaroslaw Rafa via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: New to Postfix, Google problems Jaroslaw Rafa via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: New to Postfix, Google problems Joe via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: New to Postfix, Google problems Joe via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: New to Postfix, Google problems Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: New to Postfix, Google problems Joe via Postfix-users
• [pfx] 2 Default postfix instances Michael via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: 2 Default postfix instances Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: 2 Default postfix instances Michael via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: 2 Default postfix instances Christophe Kalt via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: 2 Default postfix instances Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: 2 Default postfix instances Michael via Postfix-users
• [pfx] transport map multiple nexthop with ip address Randy Bush via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: transport map multiple nexthop with ip address Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: transport map multiple nexthop with ip address Randy Bush via Postfix-users
• [pfx] Question about the parameter: permit_mx_backup_networks Klaus Tachtler via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: Question about the parameter: permit_mx_backup_networks Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: Question about the parameter: permit_mx_backup_networks Jim Seymour via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: Question about the parameter: permit_mx_backup_networks Klaus Tachtler via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: Question about the parameter: permit_mx_backup_networks Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
• [pfx] destination_rate_delay Thomas Franz via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: destination_rate_delay Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: destination_rate_delay Thomas Franz via Postfix-users
• [pfx] dual-algo (rsa & ec) dkim signing of pfx-outbound mail -- incorrect receipt @ gmail. pfx, dkimpy or gmail issue? pgnd via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: dual-algo (rsa & ec) dkim signing of pfx-outbound mail -- incorrect receipt @ gmail. pfx, dkimpy or gmail issue? Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: dual-algo (rsa & ec) dkim signing of pfx-outbound mail -- incorrect receipt @ gmail. pfx, dkimpy or gmail issue? pgnd via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: dual-algo (rsa & ec) dkim signing of pfx-outbound mail -- incorrect receipt @ gmail. pfx, dkimpy or gmail issue? Dusan Obradovic via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: dual-algo (rsa & ec) dkim signing of pfx-outbound mail -- incorrect receipt @ gmail. pfx, dkimpy or gmail issue? Edmund Lodewijks via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: dual-algo (rsa & ec) dkim signing of pfx-outbound mail -- incorrect receipt @ gmail. pfx, dkimpy or gmail issue? pgnd via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: dual-algo (rsa & ec) dkim signing of pfx-outbound mail -- incorrect receipt @ gmail. pfx, dkimpy or gmail issue? Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: dual-algo (rsa & ec) dkim signing of pfx-outbound mail -- incorrect receipt @ gmail. pfx, dkimpy or gmail issue? pgnd via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: dual-algo (rsa & ec) dkim signing of pfx-outbound mail -- incorrect receipt @ gmail. pfx, dkimpy or gmail issue? Edmund Lodewijks via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: dual-algo (rsa & ec) dkim signing of pfx-outbound mail -- incorrect receipt @ gmail. pfx, dkimpy or gmail issue? pgnd via Postfix-users
• [pfx] postfix check reporting all (!) my ldap:// maps containing "unused parameter" Ralf Hildebrandt via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: postfix check reporting all (!) my ldap:// maps containing "unused parameter" Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: postfix check reporting all (!) my ldap:// maps containing "unused parameter" Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: [ext] Re: postfix check reporting all (!) my ldap:// maps containing "unused parameter" Ralf Hildebrandt via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: [ext] Re: postfix check reporting all (!) my ldap:// maps containing "unused parameter" Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: [ext] Re: postfix check reporting all (!) my ldap:// maps containing "unused parameter" Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
• [pfx] Question about postfix cleanup fc26wuqa--- via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: Question about postfix cleanup Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: Question about postfix cleanup fc26wuqa--- via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: Question about postfix cleanup Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
• [pfx] dual server configuration postfix--- via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: dual server configuration Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: dual server configuration postfix--- via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: dual server configuration Dmytro Alieksieiev via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: dual server configuration postfix--- via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: dual server configuration Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: dual server configuration Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: dual server configuration postfix--- via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: dual server configuration Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
• [pfx] cleanup(8): recipient_canonical can emit an over-long socketmap query with no operator guard; PERM then retried as 451 Dmytro Alieksieiev via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: cleanup(8): recipient_canonical can emit an over-long socketmap query with no operator guard; PERM then retried as 451 Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: cleanup(8): recipient_canonical can emit an over-long socketmap query with no operator guard; PERM then retried as 451 Dmytro Alieksieiev via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: cleanup(8): recipient_canonical can emit an over-long socketmap query with no operator guard; PERM then retried as 451 Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: cleanup(8): recipient_canonical can emit an over-long socketmap query with no operator guard; PERM then retried as 451 Dmytro Alieksieiev via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: cleanup(8): recipient_canonical can emit an over-long socketmap query with no operator guard; PERM then retried as 451 Dmytro Alieksieiev via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: cleanup(8): recipient_canonical can emit an over-long socketmap query with no operator guard; PERM then retried as 451 Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: cleanup(8): recipient_canonical can emit an over-long socketmap query with no operator guard; PERM then retried as 451 Dmytro Alieksieiev via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: cleanup(8): recipient_canonical can emit an over-long socketmap query with no operator guard; PERM then retried as 451 Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: cleanup(8): recipient_canonical can emit an over-long socketmap query with no operator guard; PERM then retried as 451 Dmytro Alieksieiev via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: cleanup(8): recipient_canonical can emit an over-long socketmap query with no operator guard; PERM then retried as 451 Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: multiline headers sent to milters Claus Assmann via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: multiline headers sent to milters Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: cleanup(8): recipient_canonical can emit an over-long socketmap query with no operator guard; PERM then retried as 451 Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: cleanup(8): recipient_canonical can emit an over-long socketmap query with no operator guard; PERM then retried as 451 Dmytro Alieksieiev via Postfix-users
• [pfx] ANN: list.sys4.de: DNSSEC temporary disabled Patrick Ben Koetter via Postfix-users
• [pfx] Postfix stable release 3.11.5 and legacy releases 3.10.12, 3.9.13, 3.8.19, 3.7.21, 3.6.19, 3.5.26 Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: Postfix stable release 3.11.5 and legacy releases 3.10.12, 3.9.13, 3.8.19, 3.7.21, 3.6.19, 3.5.26 Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
• [pfx] [heads up] lmdb 1.0 Michael Grimm via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: [heads up] lmdb 1.0 Geert Hendrickx via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: [heads up] lmdb 1.0 Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: [heads up] lmdb 1.0 Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: [heads up] lmdb 1.0 Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: [heads up] lmdb 1.0 Michael Grimm via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: [heads up] lmdb 1.0 Scott Techlist via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: [heads up] lmdb 1.0 Michael Grimm via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: [heads up] lmdb 1.0 Edmund Lodewijks via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: [heads up] lmdb 1.0 Christian Pfeiffer via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: [heads up] lmdb 1.0 Edmund Lodewijks via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: [heads up] lmdb 1.0 Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
• [pfx] SMTPUTF8 Danjel Jungersen via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: SMTPUTF8 John Levine via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: SMTPUTF8 Danjel Jungersen via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: SMTPUTF8 Gerald Galster via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: SMTPUTF8 Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: SMTPUTF8 John R. Levine via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: SMTPUTF8 Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: SMTPUTF8 Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: SMTPUTF8 Danjel Jungersen via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: SMTPUTF8 John Levine via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: SMTPUTF8 Danjel Jungersen via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: SMTPUTF8 Dusan Obradovic via Postfix-users
• [pfx] Postfix is incompatible with LMDB 1.0 Christian Pfeiffer via Postfix-users
• [pfx] Configuring a milter for quarantine/hold actions (documentation clarifications) Dan Mahoney via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: Configuring a milter for quarantine/hold actions (documentation clarifications) Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users
• [pfx] Trying to limit the number of users per connection and the number of concurrent connections to one domain Paul Tomblin via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: Trying to limit the number of users per connection and the number of concurrent connections to one domain Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: Trying to limit the number of users per connection and the number of concurrent connections to one domain Paul Tomblin via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: Trying to limit the number of users per connection and the number of concurrent connections to one domain Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: Trying to limit the number of users per connection and the number of concurrent connections to one domain Paul Tomblin via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: Trying to limit the number of users per connection and the number of concurrent connections to one domain Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: Trying to limit the number of users per connection and the number of concurrent connections to one domain Paul Tomblin via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: Trying to limit the number of users per connection and the number of concurrent connections to one domain Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: Trying to limit the number of users per connection and the number of concurrent connections to one domain Paul Tomblin via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: Trying to limit the number of users per connection and the number of concurrent connections to one domain Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: Trying to limit the number of users per connection and the number of concurrent connections to one domain Paul Tomblin via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: Trying to limit the number of users per connection and the number of concurrent connections to one domain Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: Trying to limit the number of users per connection and the number of concurrent connections to one domain Paul Tomblin via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: Trying to limit the number of users per connection and the number of concurrent connections to one domain Paul Tomblin via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: Trying to limit the number of users per connection and the number of concurrent connections to one domain Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: Trying to limit the number of users per connection and the number of concurrent connections to one domain Paul Tomblin via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: Trying to limit the number of users per connection and the number of concurrent connections to one domain Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
• [pfx] Attention: Postfix maintainers Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: Attention: Postfix maintainers Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: Attention: Postfix maintainers Bluejay Adametz via Postfix-users
• [pfx] restricting sender to single domain David Koski via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] restricting sender to single domain Klaus Tachtler via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: restricting sender to single domain Nick Tait via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: restricting sender to single domain Nick Tait via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: restricting sender to single domain Nick Tait via Postfix-users
• [pfx] Postfix stable release 3.11.4 and legacy releases 3.10.11, 3.9.12, 3.8.18 Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: Postfix stable release 3.11.4 and legacy releases 3.10.11, 3.9.12, 3.8.18 Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: Postfix stable release 3.11.4 and legacy releases 3.10.11, 3.9.12, 3.8.18 Danjel Jungersen via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: Postfix stable release 3.11.4 and legacy releases 3.10.11, 3.9.12, 3.8.18 Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: Postfix stable release 3.11.4 and legacy releases 3.10.11, 3.9.12, 3.8.18 Sean McBride via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: Postfix stable release 3.11.4 and legacy releases 3.10.11, 3.9.12, 3.8.18 Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: Postfix stable release 3.11.4 and legacy releases 3.10.11, 3.9.12, 3.8.18 Sean McBride via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: Postfix stable release 3.11.4 and legacy releases 3.10.11, 3.9.12, 3.8.18 Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: Postfix stable release 3.11.4 and legacy releases 3.10.11, 3.9.12, 3.8.18 Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
• [pfx] How to solve error message with sasl_passwd Freek de Kruijf via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: How to solve error message with sasl_passwd Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
• [pfx] Postfix not using configured address_verify_sender Victoriano Giralt via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: Postfix not using configured address_verify_sender Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: Postfix not using configured address_verify_sender Victoriano Giralt via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: Postfix not using configured address_verify_sender Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: Postfix not using configured address_verify_sender Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: Postfix not using configured address_verify_sender Victoriano Giralt via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: Postfix not using configured address_verify_sender Victoriano Giralt via Postfix-users
• [pfx] The "danecheck" monitoring tool has been updated Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: The "danecheck" monitoring tool has been updated Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
• [pfx] I keep getting disabled on [email protected] mailing list Al via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: I keep getting disabled on [email protected] mailing list Jim Seymour via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: I keep getting disabled on [email protected] mailing list Bill Cole via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: I keep getting disabled on [email protected] mailing list Al via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: I keep getting disabled on [email protected] mailing list Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: I keep getting disabled on [email protected] mailing list Bill Cole via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: I keep getting disabled on [email protected] mailing list Al via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: I keep getting disabled on [email protected] mailing list Fred Morris via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: I keep getting disabled on [email protected] mailing list Al via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: I keep getting disabled on [email protected] mailing list Patrick Ben Koetter via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: I keep getting disabled on [email protected] mailing list Al via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: I keep getting disabled on [email protected] mailing list Patrick Ben Koetter via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: I keep getting disabled on [email protected] mailing list Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: I keep getting disabled on [email protected] mailing list Patrick Ben Koetter via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: I keep getting disabled on [email protected] mailing list Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: I keep getting disabled on [email protected] mailing list Patrick Ben Koetter via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: I keep getting disabled on [email protected] mailing list Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: I keep getting disabled on [email protected] mailing list Al via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: I keep getting disabled on [email protected] mailing list Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: I keep getting disabled on [email protected] mailing list Jim Seymour via Postfix-users

• Earlier messages