On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 06:34:23PM -0400, Bill Cole wrote:
> Actually, there has long been a mechanism *in principle* for a
> multipart/alternative object to contain parts that differ by language, as
> described originally in RFC1766 and now in less detail by its successor
> RFC3282. I am not aware of any clients that implement that use of the
> multipart/alternative type, but if no one has actually implemented support
> I would not expect it to have survived at all in an RFC at the "draft
> standard" maturity level.
Have you tested any MIME MUAs (Thunderbird, Mail.App, ...)?
--
Viktor.
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the "Reply-To" header.
To unsubscribe from the postfix-users list, visit
http://www.postfix.org/lists.html or click the link below:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
If my response solves your problem, the best way to thank me is to not
send an "it worked, thanks" follow-up. If you must respond, please put
"It worked, thanks" in the "Subject" so I can delete these quickly.
