mouss wrote:
> MrC a écrit :
>> [snip]
>> But, your entry discovered a bug in the parsing of the sasl_sender=
>> portion of smtpd's client= log line.  The output should look like:
>>
>>        1   SASL authenticated relayed messages ------------------
> 
> This may be misleading. something like "claimed SASL sender" would be
> "more clear"?

You're right as usual mouss - thanks for the clarification.  I recall
reading the RFC some time ago, but I wasn't clear about the
circumstances for the use of sasl_sender.

I'll update for the next release.

Thanks

> 
>>        1      [EMAIL PROTECTED] (*unknown)
>>        1         *unknown
>>        1            218.30.101.41    unknown
>>
>> I've corrected the bug in 1.37.08

Reply via email to