Steffen, Because Google / Gmail / Google Workspace will put out DKIM requirements for every email from bulk senders from Feb 1st - not ARC requirements. From what I understand, DMARC alignment only happens on SPF and DKIM alignment, not on ARC alignment - and because of that, DKIM is relevant for us.
Jens On Mon, Oct 30, 2023 at 8:12 PM Steffen Nurpmeso via Postfix-users <postfix-users@postfix.org> wrote: > > It seems to me there is not much interest of mail operators in > stepping to ed25519, reducing the payload of DNS and email? > I know dkimpy supports it (and more -- but is python, uuuh!) for > long, but OpenDKIM is unchanged for eight years. (At least my > sf.net import from 2017-09-23 still stands.) > > Btw i would wonder: why do -- as email operators -- still use DKIM > at all, since there is ARC and it also offers signatures and > verification? The OpenSSL (-users) ML uses it, and it only. > (dkimpy *can* this. You know, i am against SPF and dkimpy has the > same author, only due to this i speak pro python!) > Do you take sides in some IETF internal .. whatever it is? > Do you follow the herde? > Haven't you heard anything better? > Do you (have to) sell buzz words? > Is it your operational experience that causes this result? > > --steffen > | > |Der Kragenbaer, The moon bear, > |der holt sich munter he cheerfully and one by one > |einen nach dem anderen runter wa.ks himself off > |(By Robert Gernhardt) > _______________________________________________ > Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org > To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org _______________________________________________ Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
