Bill Cole via Postfix-users:
> On 2023-12-11 at 09:37:39 UTC-0500 (Mon, 11 Dec 2023 15:37:39 +0100)
> Carlos Velasco via Postfix-users <[email protected]>
> is rumored to have said:
>
> > Bill Cole via Postfix-users escribi? el 11/12/2023 a las 15:31:
> >> On 2023-12-10 at 16:37:16 UTC-0500 (Sun, 10 Dec 2023 22:37:16 +0100)
> >> Carlos Velasco via Postfix-users <[email protected]>
> >> is rumored to have said:
> >> [...]
> >>> And doing the same work in 2 different places can be called software
> >>> efficiency?
> >> No, but the "fix" here would be a divergence from how Milter has
> >> worked
> >> since it was created and semi-documented by Sendmail Inc. It is de
> >> facto
> >> controlled by the current developers of Sendmail, but I don't believe
> >> anyone is working to make Milter better, at least not in ways that
> >> would
> >> break compatibility.
> > No one is talking here about breaking any compatibility, re-read the
> > messages.
>
> What did I miss? Are you not asking for Postfix to support providing
> milters with a header that none of them expect and which no other Milter
> implementation supports?
He asked to make this configurable. I declined because the human
cost (of having two incompatible ways to convey the connection info)
would in my opinion exceed the gain from saving a few machine cycles.
Wietse
_______________________________________________
Postfix-users mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
