postfix-users@postfix.org wrote in <zpb-edlgah-vs...@chardros.imrryr.org>: |On Fri, Jul 12, 2024 at 01:54:38AM +0200, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote: ... |No, there is no scenario in which no limit is better than an explicit |maximum. | |>|> Letting aside the "extended MAIL" client command that i never have |>|> seen, what i would hope for would be that postfix simply says |>|> |>|> 250-SIZE |>| |>|There's little to gain by doing that. Instead, just advertise the |>|absolute ceiling. |> |> The problem is that the ceiling is too low. | |You're not paying attention, the limit to advertise is the *largest* |message size (not the typical) that you might accept from any source, |to any recipient. Your policy service can then enforce lower limits |for the majority of deliveries.
Now you are joking, are you. --steffen | |Der Kragenbaer, The moon bear, |der holt sich munter he cheerfully and one by one |einen nach dem anderen runter wa.ks himself off |(By Robert Gernhardt) _______________________________________________ Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
