> Just FYI, it's better to turn off QNAME minimization on DNS servers used by > MTAs and spam checkers.
My NSes are using 9.11 and I don't have that QNAME-minimization option available in my config however looking at tcpdump, it doesn't look as if it's minimizing it. I plan to upgrade my NS soon but need a few days for that. Is that a show stopper? Thank you, Steffan Cline [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 602-793-0014 On 1/14/25, 3:30 AM, "Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users" <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >On 2025-01-13 17:41, Steffan Cline via Postfix-users wrote: >> reject_rhsbl_sender mykey.dbl.dq.spamhaus.net=127.0.1.[2..99], ^^^^^ On 13.01.25 22:08, Tomasz Pala via Postfix-users wrote: >BTW you can use DQS via public resolvers just fine - although it's >better to use own DNS with QNAME-minimization turned off. Just FYI, it's better to turn off QNAME minimization on DNS servers used by MTAs and spam checkers. -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ <http://www.fantomas.sk/> Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. I drive way too fast to worry about cholesterol. _______________________________________________ Postfix-users mailing list -- [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> _______________________________________________ Postfix-users mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
