On Sun, Jun 22, 2025 at 01:39:09PM +0100, Matthew via Postfix-users wrote:
> Thank you for your e-mail. I thought I had searched for similar discussions
> beforehand but obviously I had not done a very thorough job. Yes, exactly
> the same observations.
It is rather odd to apply a login-mismatch filter in a context in which
no logins are possible. Since the non-existent plays no role in the
outcome, you're really impossing a sender address access(5) check, for
which there's already check_sender_access.
Sure it is tempting to try to econimise on tables, but the access(5)
approach is the clean way to handle this.
--
Viktor.
_______________________________________________
Postfix-users mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
