Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote in
 <4bgttz1dbdzj...@spike.porcupine.org>:
 |Wietse Venema via Postfix-users:
 |> Steffen Nurpmeso via Postfix-users:
 |>>|Verified with 
 |>>|
 |>>|    postmap -q - 'pipemap:{regexp:rcpt-bcc.regexp,regexp:bcc-generic.reg\
 |>>|    exp\
 |>>|}'
 |>>|
 |>>|for quoted and unquoted localparts.
 |>> 
 |>> And partially quoted?  I have a bit of problems with ABNF, so
 |> 
 |> Postfix transforms envelope addresses to unquoted internal form
 |> upon message arrival, and quotes the entire localpart (if needed)
 |> to external form before table lookup.

That is cool!

 |> For example, the following quoted input forms:
 |> 
 |>     wietse ven...@example.com
 |>     "wietse venema"@example.com
 |
 |Something removed a backslash.
 | 
 |     wietse\ ven...@example.com

But that now makes me wonder, since quoted-pair is nowhere in
sight (outside of quoted-string and c(omment )content).

 |     "wietse venema"@example.com
 |
 |> both become the same table lookup key:
 |> 
 |>     "wietse venema"@example.com
 |> 
 |> Why does Postfix do that? Because Postfix policies would
 |> be trivial to evade otherwise.

I fully and blindly trust it.  I am not looking.  Do not
misunderstand my personal struggle with IMF/5322 etc etc as tries
to discredit postfix or something.  I sit in a very small corner
of the internet, it is only i collect bug and other patches as
they fly by here and there, or stumble over some statements i do
not fully parse, and anyway itch my head how *i* can deal best
with those; currently, for example, msg-id's, here mutt(1) commit
message quote(s)

    It turns out some illegal message-id headers have neither angle
    brackets nor even an '@' in them.  So adopt a different approach.
    ...
    Keep parsing inside angle brackets non-strict, because of the history
    of trac tickets (1116, 1935, 3090) demonstrating message-ids with
    spaces inside the angle brackets, double-'@'s, or even completely
    missing '@'.

So that sh.t that happens.  And eg RFC 5322 errata 3135, a bit
extended (please excuse the full paste)

      // IETF RFC 5322 errata 3135 (latter three invalid it says)
      {imf::err_content, imf::mode_none, 0, "\"\"@by", "", {0,}},
      {imf::err_content, imf::mode_none, 0, "foo.\"\"@by", "", {0,}},
      {imf::err_content, imf::mode_none, 0, "\"\".bar@by", "", {0,}},
      {imf::err_content, imf::mode_none, 0, "foo.\"\".bar@by", "", {0,}},
      {0, imf::mode_none, 1, "foo\"\"@by", "\0\0foo\0by\0", {0,}},
      {0, imf::mode_none, 1, "\"\"bar@by", "\0\0bar\0by\0", {0,}},
      {0, imf::mode_none, 1, "foo\"\"bar@by", "\0\0foobar\0by\0", {0,}},

      {imf::err_content, imf::mode_none, 0, "<\"\"@by>", "", {0,}},
      {imf::err_content, imf::mode_none, 0, "<foo.\"\"@by>", "", {0,}},
      {imf::err_content, imf::mode_none, 0, "<\"\".bar@by>", "", {0,}},
      {imf::err_content, imf::mode_none, 0, "<foo.\"\".bar@by>", "", {0,}},
      {0, imf::mode_none, 1, "<foo\"\"@by>", "\0\0foo\0by\0", {0,}},
      {0, imf::mode_none, 1, "<\"\"bar@by>", "\0\0bar\0by\0", {0,}},
      {0, imf::mode_none, 1, "<foo\"\"bar@by>", "\0\0foobar\0by\0", {0,}},

      // (adapt)
      {imf::err_content, imf::mode_none, 0, "a.().b@by", "", {0,}},
      {imf::err_content, imf::mode_none, 0, "<a.().b@by>", "", {0,}},

(it says invalid likely because obs- stuff is 'word *("." word))'
and that it is not, i see)

 |> A similar thing happens when rewriting header addresses,
 |> except that the unquoting happens later.

--steffen
|
|Der Kragenbaer,                The moon bear,
|der holt sich munter           he cheerfully and one by one
|einen nach dem anderen runter  wa.ks himself off
|(By Robert Gernhardt)
|
|During summer's humble, here's David Leonard's grumble
|
|The black bear,          The black bear,
|blithely holds his own   holds himself at leisure
|beating it, up and down  tossing over his ups and downs with pleasure
|
|Farewell, dear collar bear
_______________________________________________
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org

Reply via email to