On Sat, 04 Oct 2025 12:53:47 -0400 Bill Cole via Postfix-users <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 2025-10-04 at 12:34:01 UTC-0400 (Sat, 4 Oct 2025 12:34:01 -0400) > Jim Seymour via Postfix-users <[email protected]> > is rumored to have said: > > > Hi All, > > > > I'm confused by this one. > > > > First of all: It's a pretty old version of postfix, 3.1.0, but I > > don't think that should matter? > > You will be surprised. Bad news. Read on. You were right about both of those. > [snip] > > > > (I've trimmed some of the leading whitespace.) > > That's... unhelpful... > > Are you entirely 100% certain that all that leading whitespace was > spaces with no tabs? Since it's my code so I know what it produces: Yeah :) But I double-checked by actually manually inspecting the lines in question. > [snip] > > For backwards compatibility reasons, Postfix also > accepts OK > but it is (and always has been) treated as DUNNO. > > I know, shocking. I was surprised the first time I saw it too. Now *that* is an inconsistency I would never in a million years have expected. > > > HOWEVER, in the same man page: > > PASS optional text... [snip] > > This feature is available in Postfix 3.2 and later. > > This feature is not supported with smtp header/body > checks. > > > See what I mean about bad news? Yeah. So I guess that means download, build, install, and run a newer version of postfix. Oh well, not the first time I've done that :) Thanks, Bill. Regards, Jim -- Note: My mail server employs *very* aggressive anti-spam filtering. If you reply to this email and your email is rejected, please accept my apologies and let me know via my web form at <http://jimsun.LinxNet.com/contact/scform.php>. _______________________________________________ Postfix-users mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
