> My take is you are using way too many RBLs.  I'd suggest
> using at MOST three.

I'd tend to agree.

> >   b.barracudacentral.org

I wouldn't touch Barracuda with a 10 foot pole. This is a policy issue,
nothing to do with their current data quality, of which I have no idea.

They started life out being a spammer. This in itself is enough for me.

Then they tried to sue Vern Schryver, if memory serves.

Then they were a backscatter-o-maton in incredible numbers because
their appliances were configured in a shitty way by default and not
possible to fix. I wanted to do anything in my power to remove them
and all their creations from the internets at this point - they were
responsible for flooding my mailbox with thousands over a period of
many months.

Then they were discovered as having left backdoors in their appliances,
Krebs reported on this in 2013. The audience comments in this post
refer to things I mention above, and they weren't written by me.

At some point I seem to remember they were using Spamhaus data in
their service without having had the courtesy to ask them for
permission.

> >   bl.spamcop.net

Can result in a lot of false positives.

> >   dnsbl-1.uceprotect.net
> >   dnsbl-2.uceprotect.net

UCEProtect are wackos that I wouldn't go anywhere near.

> >   hostkarma.junkemailfilter.com

Barely maintained as the original maintainer kicked the bucket in
2018. Before that, misinformed and backscatter-o-maton.

> >   psbl.surriel.com

One of my choices.

> >   score.senderscore.com

No longer available without signing up.

-- 
Atro Tossavainen, Chairman of the Board
Infinite Mho Oy, Helsinki, Finland
tel. +358-44-5000 600, http://www.infinitemho.fi/
_______________________________________________
Postfix-users mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to