A.Schulze via Postfix-users:
Hello & a happy new year to all ...
following the discussion 'Automatic migration to non-Berkeley DB', I checked my
configuration.
Mostly, I use cdb or databases. I've only some places, where 'hash/btree/ldmb'
is used at all:
- address_verify_map
- smtp_tls_session_cache_database
- postscreen_cache_map
While using a cache file is default for 'address_verify_map' and
'postscreen_cache_map',
'smtp_tls_session_cache_database' was configured by myself.
On 06.01.26 09:13, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
Support for TLS session caches was added to Postfix 2.2 when I
adopted Lutz Jaenicke's TLS code. This was at a time that Postfix
by default did not maintain on-disk caches. Caches with DBM and
SDBM did not work, and I wasn't confident that Berkeley DB was good
enough.
I see that nowadays the docs mention btree (Berkeley DB, so it's gonna be
deprecated IIUC) or sdbm (not available at least here on Debian).
https://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#smtp_tls_session_cache_database
Luckily it also mentions lmdb, so I assume it supports enumeration although
I don't see it mentioned in lmdb_table.5.html or LMDB_README.html
Is this info (support of enumeration) available somewhere?
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, [email protected] ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
It's now safe to throw off your computer.
_______________________________________________
Postfix-users mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
