On Thu, Mar 19, 2026 at 08:19:11AM +0000, Sad Clouds via Postfix-users wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Mar 2026 19:04:35 +1100
> Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > That 26MB of RAM for "postmap" might be 2.6GB if 100 processes used
> > similarly large tables. That's probably the main barrier to using
> > texthash with sufficiently large source files.
>
> Thanks for the info. The VM's I'm using are constrained by RAM, so I'm
> tuning everything to minimise memory usage. Looks like hash is a better
> choice in my case.
If your tables are sufficiently large, the above table had 100k entries,
which is rare unless you're an ISP with tens of thousands or more users.
--
Viktor. 🇺🇦 Слава Україні!
_______________________________________________
Postfix-users mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
