Paul Menzel via Postfix-users:
> Just to avoid any misunderstandings, I mean the message, the sender of
> the force-expired message gets in the "rejection message" which
> currently is *message is administratively expired*. Sorry, if my comment
> is redundant.
Indeed. My preference would be that it is the reason to hold the
message. How would 'forced expire' distinguish between "missing
SPF" or different reasons?
Wietse
_______________________________________________
Postfix-users mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
