> From: Victor.Duchovni@ > On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 12:42:01PM -0500, Noel Jones wrote: > >> wiskbr...@hotmail.com wrote: >>>>> Here are the contents of my /etc/postfix/blocked_senders file: >>>>> >>>>> "operator#...@somephishingbanksite\.com" REJECT >>>> The above line is the wrong syntax and will never match >>>> anything. Wildcards are not allowed in dbm or other indexed >>>> files, and quotes should never be used. >>> I am almost certain that it has already worked in the past, I'll check. >>> Otherwise, any suggestions for where and how to implement such a rule? >> >> Here's an example using a regexp table instead of the dbm table for those >> two statements. It's also acceptable to use multiple check_sender_access >> statements if that fits your needs better. >> >> # main.cf >> smtpd_recipient_restrictions = >> permit_mynetworks >> reject_unauth_destination >> check_sender_access regexp:/etc/psotfix/senders.pcre >> ... other stuff ... >> >> >> # senders.pcre >> /operator#...@somephishingbanksite\.com$/ REJECT phishing >> /@mydomain\.com$/ 554 mydomain.com sender? But you're not! > > Does "regexp" support "\d+"? It looks like PCRE to me... So the > table prefix should be "pcre:" not "regexp:".
Viktor, as usual, your insight and help is invaluable. Thank you. I now have a new problem, not sure if it is related to the changes that I've made to allow the above to block inbound from my own domain. I am now unable to receive inbound email to a valid local user, where the local users alias entry contains a pipe to execute a script, i.e. "userX: |/some/script" Now I get: Recipient address rejected: User unknown in local recipient table This particular users address contains "+" signs, and is defined this way in main.cf: recipient_delimiter = + Is this still supported? Thanks, .vp
