On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 14:09 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote: > EASY steve.h...@digitalcertainty.co.uk: > > On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 12:36 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote: > > > Steve: > > > > On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 11:07 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote: > > > > > If there is a reproducible example where header_checks triggers on > > > > > body content, then I will fix it. > > > > > > > > > > All I ask for is that conditions be independently reproducible. > > > > > > > > > > Wietse > > > > In the meantime - how do I white-list this? > > > > > > Currently, the option is: > > Does that mean you will be introducing white listing for this in a > > future release? > > Currently, as in, what is available now. I am not good > at predicting the future. > > Wietse I know. If you were I would not be asking for basic features you never had the foresight to see would be requested for by end users ;-)
I'll see if I can find a link for you do download a virtual crystal ball to help.... (blows dust off 5 inch floppy disc)
