> You don't need a new "LDAP tree", just a suitable object endowed with > the right attributes. Yes, sure. But we wouldn't like to intermix alias information with user, group or host information.
> Sorry, I don't do LDAP schema design, but you should be able to Google > some examples along these lines, separately from any interaction with > Postfix. Just look for schemas for dynammic LDAP groups. Yes. I just thought thyt you as the primary designer of LDAP integration into Postfix had a certain schema in mind when implementing that feature. > The docs describe "special_result_attribute". Yes. But it seems that, without your help, I wouldn't have thought of that use case. You as the designer probably had that case in mind for implementing the feature. Thanks for the hint anyway, of course.
