On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 11:18:12AM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> > There is really no need to pursue this at this time. No evidence has
> > yet been found to support the new system being slower than the old.
>
> I think you've demonstrated it's not slower. I'm wondering why it's not
> faster,
In a complex multi-node system, the CPU capacity of one node is not
necessarily on the critical path.
> It's an interesting issue and piques my curiosity. I'd like to pursue
> this aspect to see if it might be a factor, or none at all.
"There is no there there" at this time.
--
Viktor.
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the "Reply-To" header.
To unsubscribe from the postfix-users list, visit
http://www.postfix.org/lists.html or click the link below:
<mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20postfix-users>
If my response solves your problem, the best way to thank me is to not
send an "it worked, thanks" follow-up. If you must respond, please put
"It worked, thanks" in the "Subject" so I can delete these quickly.
