On 2010-05-26 brian wrote: > On 10-05-26 03:24 PM, Ansgar Wiechers wrote: >> On 2010-05-26 Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: >>> Shouldn'T you use at least ONE RBL? >> >> Probably wouldn't hurt, but unless he's trying to fight off spam sent >> to valid users (which according to his description doesn't seem to be >> the case) he could go without as well. > > Correct. The SPAM problem is not directed at legitimate accounts > (yet). All of these rejections are for fictitious accounts under the > .com domain. I don't want to accept anything at all for that domain. > However, I must keep the domain pointed at this new server in order to > catch web traffic and redirect it.
So all of the rejected mails are for example.com, but you now use example.org instead? Your first mail sounded like there were arbitrary destination domains, not just the .com domain you want to move away from. If you don't need to accept any mail for example.com, you may want to remove the MX record(s) for that domain (in case you haven't done that already). Redirecting web traffic will work just fine without them. Regards Ansgar Wiechers -- "Abstractions save us time working, but they don't save us time learning." --Joel Spolsky
