On 2010-08-24 8:58 AM, Noel Jones <njo...@megan.vbhcs.org> wrote: > On 8/24/2010 7:41 AM, Charles Marcus wrote: >> I guess I need some clarification now... >> >> My understanding is this is not true if you have all checks under >> recipient_restrictions (and delay_reject enabled) - an OK in this >> case *would* cause the message to be accepted immediately, while a >> DUNNO would skip to the next check.
> No, behavior is still as I described. smtpd_delay_reject doesn't > change the order. That doesn't make sense to me so I must be missing something... :( Currently, I have all of my restrictions under smtpd_recipient_restrictions, so I thought that these restrictions would be evaluated in the order I added them under that section, regardless of which restriction class/section they belong to... ? >> But in any case, PERMIT/REJECT always happens immediately. >> >> Is this correct? > REJECT happens immediately, DUNNO skips to the next restriction, > OK/PERMIT skips to the next smtpd_mumble_section. I understand this, but in the predefined case where all restrictions are placed under smtpd_recipient_restrictions, doesn't this in fact mean that an OK/PERMIT would result no further checks (ie, immediate 'acceptance' of the message) since there is no other section to skip to? Otherwise I guess I'm totally confused... -- Best regards, Charles
