On Sun, 2010-11-07 at 10:58:20 -0800, Liam wrote: > On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 10:04 AM, Wietse Venema <[email protected]> wrote: > > > - LMTP has one END-OF-DATA status per recipient, instead of just one > > status for the entire mail transaction. > > > > OK, I need per-recipient status, so LMTP is indeed the right protocol. > > Is it missing any minor features from SMTP that I'm likely to need, I > wonder?
Please read the LMTP protocol RFC. -- Sahil Tandon <[email protected]>
